RED
http://www.donmarwarehouse.com/pl103.html from 9th Dec until 6th Feb 2010.
RED-Alfred Molina as Rothko and Eddie Redmayne as Ken, his studio assistant.
A new play by John Logan has started at the Donmar Warehouse and has had a good review from Michael Billington in todays Guardian. He refers to the works success at picturing Rothko as a 'working visionary'. Set design by Christopher Oram, Production designer Michael Grandage. In the 1990's we had the great play 'Art' by Yasmina Reza, perhaps this is as good?
Modern Art, History of Art, Abstract painting, Exhibitions, Art Books, England, London and beyond..
10 Dec 2009
4 Dec 2009
Re-defining Abstraction
I have come across an interesting discussion on re-evaluating Colour Field painting, with an essay by Carl Belz from the book 'Color as Field-American painting 1950-1975' curated by Karen Wilkin which came out in 2007 by the FAA.
Sam Gilliam, 'Green Web' 1967
See slide show here. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022900890.html
'..the paintings were radical in that they went to the root of painting as it was experienced by the artists who made them, by which is meant painting as it was practiced by the first generation of the New York school and by the old masters of the school of Paris before that. This entailed critically assessing painting's past achievements and taking from them the issues and ideas that were felt to be most vital in bringing painting into the present and sustaining its tradition. In this way the paintings were at once radical and conservative. You might say that what the paintings were about, then, was themselves-like art's sake-but I want to say the stakes were higher than that; I want to say they were about us. Think about what you value most in your past, think about how you'd like to extend that value into your present-think about these paintings as a model for lived experience.'
Sam Gilliam, 'Green Web' 1967
See slide show here. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022900890.html
'..the paintings were radical in that they went to the root of painting as it was experienced by the artists who made them, by which is meant painting as it was practiced by the first generation of the New York school and by the old masters of the school of Paris before that. This entailed critically assessing painting's past achievements and taking from them the issues and ideas that were felt to be most vital in bringing painting into the present and sustaining its tradition. In this way the paintings were at once radical and conservative. You might say that what the paintings were about, then, was themselves-like art's sake-but I want to say the stakes were higher than that; I want to say they were about us. Think about what you value most in your past, think about how you'd like to extend that value into your present-think about these paintings as a model for lived experience.'
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)